jessesookiereeves: (Jessica)
( Mar. 9th, 2006 05:26 pm)
Fangoria DVD Review

QUEEN OF THE DAMNED (Warner)

Image hosting by Photobucket

Reviewed by MICHAEL GINGOLD

I realize I’m one of the few, but I’ll say it again anyway: I enjoyed QUEEN OF THE DAMNED, certainly the first half, at least. I’ll also admit to having never read any of Anne Rice’s Vampire Chronicles novels, including QUEEN and THE VAMPIRE LESTAT, both of which were referenced for the making of this movie. So I’ll concede that QUEEN’s detractors may have a point when they complain about the film’s shortchanging of elements and characters from the books, while maintaining that on their own terms, parts of the feature are a hoot. And those detractors may be interested to check out the audio commentary on Warner’s QUEEN disc, which addresses many of their concerns.

Eschewing the usual anecdotes and technical information, director Michael Rymer, producer Jorge Saralegui and composer Richard Gibbs focus mostly on the adaptation of Rice’s material—which, Rymer admits, would require “an eight-hour miniseries” to fully do both books justice. They discuss in great detail how characters were altered and the narrative streamlined in order to bring the movie in at a manageable length, pointing out that certain story points (like the vampires’ psychic abilities) were being debated even as the film was being made. While this commentary will mean the most to those intimately familiar with the novels, it remains an interesting object lesson on the many decisions necessary to transfer a hefty popular fiction into a Hollywood feature.
Read more... )
jessesookiereeves: (Pandora)
( Mar. 9th, 2006 05:22 pm)
A review from Fangoria

QUEEN OF THE DAMNED

Image hosting by Photobucket

Reviewed by MICHAEL GINGOLD

Gotta love the Internet rumor-mongerers--now that QUEEN OF THE DAMNED is hitting theaters and JASON X has a set release date in April, you have to wonder if any of those people feel chagrined for insisting the movies were going direct to video. QUEEN certainly doesn't feel like something that warrants small-screen consignment, especially on a visual level, as this is one of the lushest-looking horror films in recent memory. It's pretty lush in the dramatic department, too, at least in its first and more enjoyable half.

As most anyone who's been paying attention to the film's development knows, QUEEN is based not just on the novel of the title but also author Anne Rice's previous installment, THE VAMPIRE LESTAT (onscreen, the film is credited as being "Based on THE VAMPIRE CHRONICLES"). And despite the moniker, the movie's star is really Stuart Townsend as Lestat, who is first seen waking up after a decades-long sleep to the sounds of rock 'n' roll. Charged by the music, he joins a fledgling band and is soon leading them to worldwide success, both fitting in perfectly with the vampire/Goth subculture and taking it to new heights of popularity. Townsend is terrific in the role; Tom Cruise in the previous INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE film may have successfully integrated his cocky screen persona into Lestat's sardonic demeanor, but Townsend makes the part his own. This Lestat is "younger," more vital and more fully enjoys his creature-of-the-night persona, and Townsend attacks the role with a palpable relish.
Read more... )
.

Profile

jessesookiereeves: (Default)
jessesookiereeves

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags